Header graphic for print
The Corporate Observer A Publication by Attorneys Devoted to Protecting Consumer Rights

The Persecution of Barry Bonds? A Reply to William Rhoden

Posted in In the Courts

I grew up loving baseball.  My team was the Chicago Cubs.  My favorite player was… well of course… Mr. Cub, Ernie Banks.  I remember his unique style at the plate; he would slowly and deliberately roll his hands and fingers on the bat handle as he awaited the next pitch.  Watching on our family’s black and white television, I tensely waited each at bat for a home run and Jack Brickhouse (yes that was his name) cheer, "it’s back, it’s back, it’s a home run!"  My second favorite player was Ferguson Jenkins, the Cubs’ best pitcher, number 31.  He had an amazing curveball and I expected him to win every start, even against our arch-rivals the St. Louis Cardinals and the great Bob Gibson.  Rounding out my favorites among the Cubs was Billy Williams, the most graceful player I have ever seen.  He was pure poetry in everything he did on the field.

My three heroes were black.  I am white.

In his column today, William Rhoden of the New York Times suggests Barry Bonds was prosecuted because he was black and compares that prosecution to the charges brought against heavyweight boxer Jack Johnson for trumped up violations of the Mann Act over one hundred years ago.  I respectfully disagree. 

Barry Bonds was prosecuted because he was the best, the most high profile player in the game.  His indictment would put the use of illegal steroids and their dramatic side effects on the front pages for weeks and months.  Tens of thousands of young athletes, many still in high school would no doubt get a more “clear” picture of the risks and downsides of steroids than from the pusher with the gym bag that lurked underneath the stands. 

Prosecutors are allowed to selectively prosecute.  Leonna Helmsley, a famous hotel owner and celebrity of sorts, was prosecuted for tax evasion and challenged her conviction on just that ground.  The courts denied her challenge.  Why do you think Martha Stewart was targeted? Not because the prosecutors didn’t like her chocolate chip muffin recipe.  No it was because she was famous.  Because if she could go to jail for telling a little fib to an FBI agent, anyone could go to prison. 

In my opinion, that’s why Bonds was prosecuted.  If you are going to take on steroids and the requirement for truthful testimony before a Grand Jury, you want the biggest fish in the pond.  Do you think the prosecution of some random minor leaguer would garner the same or even any attention of the press?   

Sharing the sports page with Mr. Rhoden’s column this morning was another famous black athlete, Tiger Woods.  Despite his dramatic fall from grace, Woods remains beloved by golf and non-golf fans.  Thousands on the course at Augusta and millions watching on television yearned for Tiger to make a charge.  Black or white they hoped he would find the fairway and putts would fall.

As a former federal prosecutor and baseball fan, I think that prosecutors bemoaned the fact that Barry was black.  They knew race would be infused into their efforts to expose the harms of steroids; certainly complicating a “clear” case of lying.  But alas, I come at this issue with my own sensibilities.  I respect Mr. Rhoden’s contrary position.

  • http://www.azcriminallawsexcrimes.com Vladimir Gagic

    I don’t think the US Atty prosecuted Bonds because he is black, but from what I know of his case and of other baseball players, Bonds was not the worst offender. He may have had the worst attitude, at least according to ESPN, but what Rafael Palmero did, is in my mind, much worse than Bonds.

  • Sick of cheaters

    n response to : Again a star Is Prosecuted For His Unlikability
    “The eight year pursuit of Bonds reflects America’s discomfort with prominent, wealthy, black men?”
    ‘Jack Johnson is the antecedent to Bonds?’ Comparing Barry Bonds to Jack Johnson is like comparing The Clear to flaxseed oil… They couldn’t be more disparate.
    Mr. Rhoden, Barry Bonds is an arrant CHEATER. An ADMITTED steroid user. By comparing these two men You discredit Mr. Johnson who did nothing underhanded to attain his success. He went in the ring as a hated and despised man only because of the color of his skin. He withstood the jeers and the hate, and he routed everyone they put in front him. A true and clear Champion. Arrogance yes. Cheater no. Mr. Johnson WAS prosecuted because he was black.
    Trying to say that Bonds is being prosecuted because he is a powerful, successful, black man makes YOU look foolish. Bonds IS a criminal and a CHEAT. The drugs he took are controlled substances. It’s against the law to possess them without a prescription. According to Major League Baseball “the clear” and everything in it are banned substances. Bonds isn’t being persecuted because ‘people dont like him.’ Bonds is being persecuted because he LIED to the grand jury and to federal agents and broke the rules of Major League Baseball. No one will get away with that no matter what color your skin is..or what league you play in. Just ask Roger Clemens.
    Bonds is an arrogant, spoiled and self-absorbed steroid cheat who has defaced a great record set by one of the most talented, honorable and humble men the sporting world has ever known. Mr Aaron and the rest of America must be wondering just you are thinking by trying to make a victim out of a criminal like Barry Bonds.
    You whining about racism towards Bonds is as bad as Bonds whining about fans and media persecuting him for cheating.
    No one should be punished for the color of their skin. Everyone should be punished for cheating