Header graphic for print
The Corporate Observer A Publication by Attorneys Devoted to Protecting Consumer Rights

Monthly Archives: January 2012

The Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group: Too Little Too Late

Posted in Consumer Protection

With great fanfare, the President during his State of the Union, announced the formation of the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group….My former boss at the Department of Justice, Eric Holder, knows how to fight crime. He sat for a time as a Superior Court Judge in the District of Columbia and later as US Attorney for the District of Columbia. He’s gotta know this isn’t how it’s done. You don’t send the police out four years after the crime. This is window dressing for an election year sound bite – nothing more.

MF Global’s Missing $1.2 Billion: It’s not lost

Posted in Banks and Financial Services

The money was taken from MF Global’s customer accounts (traders, farmers, individuals, brokers) and used by MF Global to support their mounting trading losses in European debt. I suspect it was a frenzy of activity, but someone stole the money. Perhaps not all at once, but a few hundred million there a few hundred million here and you are at $1.2 billion.
Who stole the money? Who authorized the siphoning of funds from customer accounts to cover the proprietary trading of MF Global? Was it SenaGovernor Corzine?

The Shoe’s on the Other Foot: Merrill Lynch Fined $1 Million for Skirting Arbitration

Posted in Banks and Financial Services

As Merrill Lynch’s own actions point out, a denial of access to the courts can be maddening when you didn’t choose arbitration. In these cases (what we call adhesion contracts), the courts are more likely to offer a suitable remedy. And everyone, corporation and consumer alike, should have the opportunity to select the forum for resolving disputes.

CompuCredit, Concepcion, and The Death of Consumer Rights

Posted in Consumer Protection

Simply put, change is needed. Without congressional or judicial action, consumers will soon find themselves without recourse for a majority of corporate grifting. Rulings like Concepcion and CompuCredit are unacceptable for the low income family tricked into $257 of fees and just $43 of credit. It will be nearly impossible to fight a major corporation for just $257 without the help of an attorney or the cost sharing of a class suit. When class actions are stymied, consumers lose and corporations win – big – or so they think. Eventually everyone loses when the system is devoid of fairness.

What’s Less Than a Slap on the Wrist? FINRA’s $725,000 “Fine” of Citigroup

Posted in Banks and Financial Services

The Wall Street Journal reported today that FINRA has fined Citigroup a whopping $725,000 for failures to disclose investment-banking relationships. Instead of the window dressing we are getting from FINRA, investors deserve strict and swift action. Substantial sanctions send a message that rules are important and that the public takes regulation seriously. A $725,000 fine hardly sends that message.

H. David Kotz Resigns as SEC’s General Counsel

Posted in Consumer Protection

The United States adopted the position during the Revolutionary War: An Army Inspector General was assigned to training the Continental Army and ensuring uniformity of tactics. In the three-plus centuries since, the role has expanded in the United States to just about every major governmental department. Mr. Kotz filled the role admirably at the SEC, and at a difficult time.

Article: In the Wake of Concepcion and Dukes, Consumer Class Action Lawyers Must Soldier Forward By Leveraging Their Rich History and Taking Some Clues from the Whistleblower Bar

Posted in Consumer Protection

My new article takes a hopeful view of the future viability of the consumer class action practice. To support my confidence I draws from the practice’s long and rich history dating back to medieval England, and encourages class action practitioners to learn from the Qui Tam bar, which has enjoyed growing success as an increasing number of statutes provide whistleblowers with legal protections and financial rewards.

Life Partners Holdings – A Sordid Business with Suspect Practices: The SEC Files Suit

Posted in Banks and Financial Services

As if the business of betting on death wasn’t already sleazy enough, the folks over at Life Partners have taken it to a whole new level. “Have you no shame, Mr. Pardo and Mr. Pelden?” It’s one thing to be in the business of profiting on the early death of others but to do that and cheat is just beyond reprehensible. I can’t see this pair being invited to the elementary school on “what my father does for a living day.”